Bonnie Blue, a controversial adult content creator, has publicly addressed the backlash surrounding her infamous “Schoolies” stunt. The event, which involved engaging in sexual activities with “barely legal” young men and filming the encounters for an adult subscription platform, provoked widespread outrage.
Blue, who faced deportation from both Australia and Fiji for visa violations, told News.com.au that she stands by her actions despite being labelled “predatory” by critics. She defended her practices as consensual and highlighted the safeguards she implements to ensure ethical standards.
Consent and Safeguards
Blue argued that her actions are not predatory, emphasising strict protocols to ensure consent. She explained that participants must complete multiple consent forms, provide physical identification, and pass a breathalyser test before taking part.
“They chose to contact me, gave consent, and allowed me to film,” Blue stated. “Consent is thoroughly discussed throughout the process, and I ensure all boundaries are respected.”
She added that participants are required to use protection and engage in open conversations about expectations and comfort levels.
Addressing Criticism
Blue dismissed criticism over her use of the term “barely legal” in promotional materials, claiming her focus was on legality.
“The key word here is ‘legal,’” she said. “I understand that people may not agree with my content, but that doesn’t make me predatory. My aim is to educate young adults about safe sex, consent, and understanding their bodies.”
However, critics argue that legality alone is not a sufficient defence.
Expert Concerns
Harrison James, an activist and abuse survivor, raised concerns about the ethical implications of Blue’s actions. “Bonnie’s practice of sharing her location online and allowing participants to queue creates significant risks of coercion and exploitation,” James told News.com.au. “True consent requires emotional maturity and an environment free from undue influence, which these scenarios lack.”
James also criticised Blue’s framing of her actions as “educational,” stating, “Sex education should take place in trusted and regulated environments, not through encounters that profit an adult content creator.”
Legal vs Ethical Implications
James highlighted the power imbalance between Blue and her young participants, many of whom are just entering adulthood.
“Legality doesn’t equate to morality,” he said. “While technically legal, these actions exploit vulnerabilities and normalise predatory dynamics under the guise of education.”
Public Outrage
Blue’s stunt prompted a petition on Change.org calling for her deportation from Australia, which amassed nearly 100,000 signatures. The petition accused her of exploiting the Schoolies event to prey on young men and profit from explicit content.
Following the cancellation of her Australian visa, Blue and fellow adult content creator Annie Knight relocated their activities to Fiji. However, they encountered similar legal challenges there, with the Fijian government accusing them of violating visitor visa conditions. Deputy Prime Minister Viliame Gavoka described their presence as “harmful” to Fiji’s image, resulting in their eventual departure.
Blue and Knight Respond
Knight supported Blue’s position, stating that they both adhere to rigorous procedures to ensure participants are comfortable and consenting. “We only proceed with those who are mature and entirely certain about participating,” Knight explained. “If anyone seems unsure, we don’t let them continue.” Both Blue and Knight rejected accusations of predatory behaviour, asserting that their work involves willing participants who are fully aware of the activities. “I’m not preying on anyone,” Blue said. “I’m offering a service, and people come to me willingly. The criticism comes from those who don’t understand the process.” Despite the backlash, Blue remains defiant, describing the outrage as “unwarranted” and “overblown.”
Bonnie Blue shocks the adult industry: Full Interview